Saturday, 31 December 2016

Musings of a Family Historian


New Year thoughts.....

2016 is now behind us and thus a whole year consigned to the history books.  As I begin this new year with hearty good wishes from all around the world directed to me and my family from people I have never met face to face but whose DNA I share, I wonder if Family Historians are a special breed of people. Are we the people that our closest family don't really bother with; or see as the black sheep or regard as an oddball? Is that why we feel we have to gather generations of people up and hold them tight - my family!  Is this why some genealogists refuse to share "their" tree?

Image result for my precious meme

Personally, yes I'm the black sheep.  I have been for many years since I produced what previous generations would have called "a bastard child". Oh my. It turned my family upside down to be honest. My wonderful open father and my kind, stern, reserved mother were shattered. Shattered by me. Shattered by a grandchild that they never saw. It ruined my relationship with them for ever.  It ruined my relationship with my beloved brother for nearly 10 years until we kissed and made up.

Leaping forward a generation, my daughter Claire presented me with the most wonderful gift 18 years ago, my grandson Max, named for my father. He also was born out of wedlock (what a wonderful term) but he was never "a bastard child". He was longed for by his parents (eventually safely married to my mother's great relief), by his grandparents, by his adoring aunts and by his great grandparents.  My mother prayed during Claire's difficult pregnancy and birth and rejoiced in our beautiful boy.

How things have changed in that short generational span. Babies born and loved whether their parents are "in a relationship" or not. Very few people look sideways at an unmarried couple with a child these days. Couples have a child, buy a house and get married in the reverse order of the way things were meant to happen a generation back.

Nevertheless, perceived family hurts and slights continue to fester and Family Historians keep gathering more and more family from around the world to hold and become part of.  Strangely, some of my genie buddies have family who refuse to allow them access to family photos or DNA tests or documents which would open a whole new side of their family tree. They think those things belong to them only. And it is so sad. Many of my friends have trees on Ancestry.com that are "private" ie they alone can see them and build them and only invited people can access them. They have their reasons for this and they tell me them. I think their reasons suck.  "Someone might copy a picture I have up there." Hello?  This is my great great grandfather too!

I'm raving now...sorry....but they are so selfish. History belongs to the world, not to a cardboard box under your bed that your children will find after your death and throw in the skip! Let's start the new year sharing. I'll show you mine if you show me yours.

Image result for my precious meme

Deborah Watson
Black Sheep and Family Historian
Te Aroha, New Zealand
1 January 2017

© Deborah Watson 2017















Sunday, 26 June 2016

A Passionate Man


The first indication I had that my 2x great grandfather William Todd may not have been an upstanding member of the Temuka community came when I read the following Letter to the Editor in the Timaru Herald dated 17 August 1876:

Inhuman conduct? Excluded from church membership? What on earth was this about? As I delved further into William's life I found a story of bullying, child abuse, bankruptcy, fraud and family desertion.  As with most family history research this information came in dribs and drabs, sometimes huge chunks of information and sometimes little snippets to set my head reeling.  It's quite a story and I have the feeling that there is still a lot to discover.  This is what I know.

William Todd was born in County Armagh, Ireland in about 1839. Various documents confirm the country and the year so I'm quite happy with that, though if I could find a birth registration I would be over the moon. His parents were William Todd (1793-1877) and Eliza Hampton (1814-1899) who were both born in Ireland.  They were married in 1839 and William jnr is the first of their children that I have identified.  He was followed by Violetta in 1841, Robert in 1843, Hampton in 1851, Patten in 1852, John Colvin in 1855 and Mary Ann in 1856. In addition, according to William's mother's death certificate there were also "8 males deceased".

On 21 October 1862 the clipper ship Chariot of Fame, a 1640 ton vessel, set out for Lyttelton from London under the command of Captain Robert Kerr.  This ship was renowned for the speed of a previous voyage from London to Melbourne and was state of the art for its day, even boasting of having a milch cow on board for the comfort of passengers. The ship docked on 29 January 1863 and among the passengers is listed "Todd".  There are no details for this passenger but I believe it to be William.

On his arrival William headed for Winchester, a small settlement about eight kilometres from Temuka.

Meanwhile Mary Bruce Keith who was born in Kilkenzie in Argyleshire, Scotland was preparing to emigrate to New Zealand. Whether Mary had met William Todd before she made the decision to emigrate is unknown but the chance to start a new life in a new land must have been very attractive to entice her to leave her home in Greenock. On 23 July 1863 she boarded the ship Brothers' Pride for the trip to Lyttelton.

There are many newspaper accounts of the terrible voyage of Brothers' Pride under Captain Alexander Glendining and the subsequent investigations.  The ship was battered by gales and storms and then sickness broke out among the passengers. Forty six deaths occurred before the Lyttelton Heads were sighted. The ship was quarantined at Camp Bay on 9 December 1863, 140 days after it left London. Four more passengers died during the 28 days that  the ship was quarantined with the yellow fever flag flying.  Finally Mary was allowed to leave the ship and the next day, 6 January 1864, she and William Todd were married at the home of Mr Saddler in Tuam Street, Christchurch. William gave his occupation as "gardener" and Mary said she was a "tailoress".

It would seem that they lived peacefully; there are no newspaper accounts of anything untoward while their marriage lasted.

William and Mary had at least three children together although there are births recorded for just two. My great grandmother Mary Violetta Todd was born in December 1866 (recorded) and her sister Eliza Jane was born in 1869 (unrecorded). In 1870 a little boy was born. Unfortunately, although his birth is recorded, his name is not. 

Then on 22 July 1874, after 10 years of marriage, Mary Bruce Todd died.  Her death certificate says that she died after a prolonged labour but there is no living or stillborn child recorded in births or deaths for the area. It is even possible that Mary died after a miscarriage - we will never know.
from the Timaru Herald, 29 July 1874

According to the original cemetery records, William purchased two burial plots side by side on 22 July 1874.  Mary was buried in Temuka Cemetery on 25 July 1874 in row 61 plot 8. It is possible, but there is no evidence, that Mary's last child is buried in her arms. There is no record of a burial in plot 9 which is the second plot owned by William Todd. Maybe William purchased two plots thinking that he would be buried beside his wife.  William's story, however, doesn't stop with the death of his young wife and his own death was not to be in New Zealand.

After Mary's death, William was left on his own with his three small children; Mary Violetta aged 8 and a half, Eliza Jane aged about 5 and his wee son aged 4. With a farm to run as well as children to care for it is hardly surprising that he quickly remarried.

William's new wife was another Mary seeking a new life in New Zealand.  Mary Wilson was born in Fife, Scotland in about 1853. On 04 March 1874 Mary had left Plymouth aboard the Ballochmyle and arrived in Lyttelton on 01 June 1874.  Mary was listed as a dairymaid on the ship manifest.  William and his new bride were married at the home of W McCullum, Epworth, Temuka on 22 December 1874.  Mr McCullum had a bacon factory at Epworth and seems to have hosted a few weddings and funerals at his house.  William had been a widower for exactly six months.

The location of William's residence has been described variously as Orari, Temuka, Winchester, Arowhenua, Geraldine and Waihi.  All these locations are in close proximity to each other.  In 1875 his property was listed in the New Zealand Electoral Rolls as "Section 2902, Waihi Crossing, Geraldine, Canterbury". Mary Wilson, aged 21 years, must have thought she had struck the jackpot marrying a handsome man with land and a house but she quickly discovered that marriage was not always the answer to a single woman's prayers.  The work was hard, the days were long and there were three children to care for who were not her own. Added to that, William was a cruel man who treated  his children and new wife dreadfully.

On 24 August 1876 William Todd was summoned to court and charged that "on 09 August he has unlawfully beaten and assaulted" his daughter, (my great grandmother) Mary Violetta Todd.  The Auckland Star reported the crime as being "a most unnatural case of revolting brutality". John Albert Young, an hotel keeper and Special Constable at Winchester, and his wife had noticed "the state of the child" on numerous occasions and on Thursday 10 August when they saw her at Mr Klee's property across from the hotel they must have thought enough was enough and they took her home with them. They had seen two little girls support Mary as she walked from the school - she was unable to walk unattended. Later that day William came to claim his daughter and Mr Young told him that she was in his care and he would not give her up.  Mrs Young had thought Mary had been beaten by her mother but William soon let her know that he had done it and he would do it again because Mary "told falsehoods." Mr Young gave evidence that he brought Mary to the police station on Friday 11 August "half naked and covered with bruises on every part of the body that I saw." Mrs Young and Mrs Klee went with Mr Young to the police station with Mary and that they had to take her in "the trap" as she was unable to walk. Dr McIntyre was sent for and Mary was examined and taken to hospital.

Dr McIntyre gave evidence of Mary's condition and was also cross examined by Alfred St George Hamersley,  who was representing William:


Hamersley practiced as a solicitor in Timaru for 13 years and was an English rugby union international who had captained England in 1874. Hamersley commented, to applause from the body of the Court, that before coming to Court he had only a few moments with the defendant. Now that he knew the facts of the case he should  "throw it up and let the defendant conduct it himself."

Mary, aged just nine had to give evidence against her father.  The newspaper reported that she looked "weak and emaciated" but that she spoke in a clear and straightforward manner.
William's evidence was met with much derision from the Court:
My great grandfather George Cliff who lived 1/4 mile away from the Todds at Winchester had been subpoenaed to give evidence.  He said that he had never seen any evidence that William had abused Mary Violetta but added that William was "a passionate man".
At this everyone in the body of the Court cheered but were silenced by the police.  As William was led away to prison people hissed and yelled "lynch him".
William had been sentenced to six months imprisonment which means that March 1877 was his release date.  Whether he returned to Mary when he was released is not known but on 25 August 1877, the following appeared in the Timaru Herald:

It is not clear why this case was withdrawn. Did Mary believe that William would return to her and their life would take a turn for the better?  If that was the case then her hopes were in vain. Mary, left with no means of support, had no choice but to file for a Judicial Separation in the hope that William would be compelled to maintain her. Alfred St George Hamersley who had previously defended William and expressed his displeasure at doing so, was now firmly on Mary's side.  He acted for Mary as she filed her plea asking for a Judicial Separation and "such further or other relief" that the judge might see fit to award her:

The Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act was New Zealand's first divorce law and was passed in 1867.  Divorce was not common in 19th century New Zealand. The Encyclopedia of New Zealand says that divorce was "a scandalous, shameful rarity, which was seen as challenging the sanctity of marriage. Separation and desertion were alternatives to divorce.  Desertion was widely believed at the time to happen more often in New Zealand than elsewhere."  The law was very biased against women who had to prove that the husband had committed  "adultery plus sodomy, incest, bestiality, bigamy, rape or extreme cruelty." Men, on the other hand, needed to prove "only adultery on the part of his wife." Such were the misogynistic conditions of the times that Mary Wilson had to pit her wits against.

A divorce and a judicial separation are very different things.  A divorce means the couple are no longer married, no longer live together and have nothing to do with one another. A judicial separation on the other hand means the marriage is still in force but the couple no longer live together.  Mary did not petition the court for a divorce.

Mary said in her affidavit that her husband had deserted her on numerous occasions; that he had exerted extreme cruelty towards her; that she had many times feared for her life and that William had had "illicit intercourse" with many women.  Among many acts of cruelty, Mary alleged that William had beaten her with his stock whip until she feared for her life, forced her head into the fire and set her hair on fire, kicked her in the "tender parts" of her body with his boots on until she feared for her life and locked her out of doors all night on several occasions "without coverings or clothes".  Mary said that she was in daily fear of her life being taken by William Todd.
On Friday 05 October 1877, Detective Officer James Darrell served William Todd with a Citation dated 11 September 1877 outlining Mary's case and the date that William was required to appear in court. William was found in Wellington where, in partnership with a man named Johns, he had opened a business in Willis Street "nearly opposite the Melbourne Hotel".  The following advertisement was from the Evening Post on 12 October 1877:

Mary went to court on 15 January 1878.  William Todd did not appear.  Mary gritted her teeth and told of the horror of her abusive marriage.  And oh how that papers loved it! The case was written up like a comedy; a forerunner to the lascivious pieces put together under the guise of being newsworthy in the NZ Truth in days to come.  Every salacious detail was revealed.  But finally Mary, after having to prove she was married to William Todd and the ways in which she had been treated with cruelty and abandoned without means of support, was granted her judicial separation.
And where was William while Mary was telling her story?  Mary testified that she thought he was in Wellington, that he had sold his farm which she said was 200 acres for £1,000 so that she would have no money and that he had told her he had "put his three children in the reformatory".
On 16 January 1878, the day after Mary obtained the judicial separation, William Todd filed a statement that he was unable to meet his engagements with creditors. Mary would never see a penny of the money from the sale of William's property.  This is the last evidence of William Todd in New Zealand that I can find.
On 01 February 1878, Phillip Moeller advertised the notice above advising caution in any dealings with William Todd. In a twist of fate, solicitor Philip Moeller administered the Todd and Johns estates only to be adjudged bankrupt himself four years later with the Todd and Johns estates named as creditors owed £108.6s.5d. Meanwhile William had thought of a plan to permanently rid himself of his debts, his wife, three children and a country which he no doubt felt had not treated him kindly. The Police Gazette of 1878 records that a warrant was issued for his arrest but William was long gone by then:
I have no record of the fate of William's second Mary - Mary Todd is a very common name and it has proved impossible to trace her.

I do know what happened to William and it's a story so incredible that I can hardly believe it.  Sometime after 16 January 1878 when he signed papers declaring his bankruptcy, William set off for Scotland to the home of his first wife Mary Bruce Keith.  It's likely that he is the "Wm Todd" on board the Kent which left Melbourne for London in February 1878. He must have been a great story teller because on 03 June 1878 William married Rachel Bruce Keith, the sister of his first wife, in the District of St Giles in the City of Edinburgh. Rachel was a domestic servant living in Edinburgh and both her parents were dead, her mother just eighteen months before. Maybe Rachel felt that this was her chance of marriage and a new life with her dead sister's husband.  It is possible that they had met before; possible that he had courted Mary before he left for New Zealand and met her family including Rachel; so he may have known Rachel from that time.  On the marriage document William said that he was a widower and that he lived in Canterbury, New Zealand. William was still married to Mary Wilson of course and so this marriage was bigamous. I go over in my head what it could have been that William said to convince Rachel that it was fine to abandon his children in New Zealand and start again with her.  How much did she know of his past when she agreed to marry him?

William decided that once again he would emigrate.  This time he avoided New Zealand and set his sights on Australia - new country, new wife, new beginning! His sister Violetta had emigrated to Sydney on board the Sultana in 1865 and his brother Robert on board the You Yangs in 1866 so there were family already "down under". William and his new wife, his recently widowed mother Eliza, his brother Hampton and his sister Mary Anne arrived in Sydney from London on board the Whampoa on 21 September 1878.  Nine months after leaving New Zealand, with two 100 day sea voyages and a marriage under his belt, William started all over again.

William's Australian story is not nearly so dramatic as his New Zealand chapter.  There are no distressing newspaper reports.  William acquired land in Darlington in 1881 and became a farmer of the 306 acre Burnside Farm.
William and Rachel had six children together: Bruce Hampton 1881-1961, William Todd 1882-1935, Margaret Jane Bruce 1884-1885, Joseph James Colvin 1887-1932, David Archibald 1889-1958 & Percy Albert 1891-1977.  It is unknown whether he ever saw the children of his first marriage again.

William's daughter Mary Violetta Todd married George Cliff of Winchester, the man who had given testimony that William was "a passionate man".  She carried the mental scars of her father's abuse of her for the rest of her life

William died in Brisbane on 17 August 1909 of senile decay and heart failure and is buried in Toowong Cemetery.  Rachel Bruce Todd died on 28 May 1928 in Brisbane.

When I began researching the Todd family I found it hard to believe that William Todd was actually one person - I thought that maybe, just maybe, other people named William Todd (it is a common name) had been added to the mix. But things added up - signatures on documents; family records; legal documents; newspaper reports; land ownership records; witness statements; place names; trial dates; birth, death and marriage certificates; ship manifests all led me to the conclusion that William Todd was just one man with many faces. And then the coup de grace which brought everything together.  At the beginning of this year I had my DNA analysed and thus the last piece of the puzzle was put in place. My DNA is a match with the Australian great great grandchildren of William Todd.


© Deborah Watson 2016


Saturday, 18 June 2016

Gravesend to an Early Grave

In 1863 if you boarded a ship in Gravesend for Lyttleton there was little chance that you would ever see the land of your birth again.  For Mary Keith, a single seamstress aged 21 years, the prospect of such a voyage must have been extremely daunting and yet incredibly exciting.  A voyage to the other side of the world, alone. A chance for a new life and a new beginning away from the streets of Greenock where people had endured 10 years of potato famine and poverty. Perhaps a husband and a family and land of her own to farm and become prosperous.  So many thoughts must have been swirling in my great great grandmother's head.

Mary Bruce Keith was born in about 1843 in Kilkenzie, Argyleshire, Scotland.  She was the third child of the ten children of John MacKeith (aka John Keith) 1806-1857 and Mary Bruce 1812-1876. In 1851 the family were living at Balachantye in the parish of Killean and Kilkenzie where John supported the family working as a Roading Contractor.

In 1861 Mary was living on her own at 20 East Quay Lane in Greenock and making her living as a seamstress.  This occupation would have involved her both making and mending clothing.  Not far from Mary's home were the Greenock Docks where ships departed for foreign ports.

By 1863 Mary was preparing to leave Scotland and emigrate to New Zealand.  She may have seen some of the posters advertising New Zealand as a great place to live and inviting single men and women to travel, with their fare subsidised by the New Zealand Government, to their new home. It is also possible that she may have already met her future husband and promised him that she would travel to join him in Lyttleton.
The advertisements in the clippings above are from the London Times on 11 July 1863.

Samuel Vernon, a licensed passenger broker, advertised on 04 July 1863 in The Glossop Record that Brother's Pride was one of several "celebrated clippers, well known for their quick passages, punctuality in sailing, and splendid accommodation, are unsurpassed by any ships in the world and afford to passengers and shippers the most unrivalled advantages."  Mary, along with the other passengers, was to discover that Vernon's assertions and other advertising in the newspapers of the day did not resemble the truth.

What we do know is that on 23 July 1863 Mary was on board Brother's Pride, a clipper ship weighing 1236 tons, with 371 other passengers bound for Lyttleton. Mary, like many of the passengers, was an assisted immigrant travelling for £13.6s.0d. The ship left London and arrived in Gravesend on the same day to board the passengers and here is where things began to go wrong. The doctor, instead of medically examining each passenger as they boarded as he was required to do, simply called out their names and the head of each family pointed out which children belonged to them as they boarded. A young boy with scarlet fever was in the crowd of passengers.  Although the lad had boarded he was sent back to his home in Gloucestershire where he died three days later. Meanwhile people kept getting on to the ship unaware that they had been exposed to a deadly disease.

H B Hale, a passenger and habitual writer of letters to newspapers, recalled the birth of a child on 4 August and said that the day after that little Joseph Bailey died.  By this time many passengers were ill and by 9 September there had been nine deaths but also five births. The ship crossed the equator on 16 September and though Hale recalls it as being a time of fun, other passengers reported that the sailors were demanding drinking money from the passengers on the threat of being shaved if they did not pay up. Some paid but were still shaved, others did not pay and were shaved.  This involved tar being smeared on their beards and a piece of old iron scrapped along their chins. And people continued dying at an alarming rate.

The fever was "truly of an appalling character" according to the ship's doctor Fitzherbert Dermott. Passengers were later to complain of the doctor's incompetence and drunkedness when taking care of women in labour and of sick children. Others told of wet berths, of stench below decks (where the steerage class passengers were housed), of the lack of medical supplies and food, and of the filth from dogs and sheep left to roam freely on deck.

In the later inquiry into the voyage Dr Dermott told of the terrible deaths that occurred.  He said that "children would seem healthy one minute and then be dead within just a few hours, dying of suffocation". As well as the scarlet fever introduced at Gravesend, people were now dying of typhoid. Added to this were the huge seas and constant storms, the ship battered by gales and the frequent burials at sea. By the time the ship limped into Lyttleton on 6 December 140 days after it left Gravesend, forty six passengers had died.

The ship was put into quarantine at Camp Bay for 28 days and ordered to fly the yellow fever flag as typhoid was still present.  Four more people died and were buried there.  There are reports of people leaving the ship despite the quarantine, and arrests were made.

Finally after 28 boring days at Camp Bay, Mary was allowed to leave the ship.  On the very next day, 6 January 1864, she and William Todd were married at the home of Mr Saddler in Tuam Street, Christchurch. William gave his occupation as "gardener" and Mary said she was a "tailoress".  We will never know if the couple knew each other before Mary set out for New Zealand and, if they did, where they would have met, as Mary was born in Scotland and her new husband was a native of County Amargh in Ireland.

William and Mary settled in Orari, about 4 miles from the little settlement of Waihi in Geraldine where William had 200 acres of land. It would seem that they lived peacefully; there are no newspaper accounts of anything untoward while their marriage lasted.

I know that William and Mary had at least four children although there are births recorded for just two. My great grandmother Mary Violetta Todd was born in December 1866 (recorded) and her sister Eliza Jane was born in 1869 (unrecorded). In 1870 a little boy was born.  Unfortunately, although his birth is recorded, his name is not. 

Then in July 1874 the unthinkable happened. Mary went into labour but it was a long protracted labour and Mary didn't recover. At just 31 years old Mary Bruce Todd died on 22 July 1874.  
from the Timaru Herald, 29 July 1874

There is no record of what happened to the baby if indeed there was a baby - there may have been a stillborn child or even a miscarriage.  There is no birth or death registered for a child.

According to the original cemetery records, William purchased two burial plots side by side on 22 July 1874.  Mary was buried in Temuka Cemetery on 25 July 1874 in row 61 plot 8. It is possible, but there is no evidence, that Mary's last child is buried in her arms. There is no record of a burial in plot 9 which is the second plot owned by William Todd. Maybe William purchased two plots thinking that he would be buried beside his wife.  William's story, however, doesn't stop with the death of his young wife and his own death was not to be in New Zealand.
photo by Ross Collins, 2x great grandson of Mary Bruce (Keith) Todd

Mary lies peacefully in Temuka far from her homeland.  Her legacy has been handed down through the generations that follow her by the use of her middle name "Bruce". This name has been given to many children in the Todd, Cliff and Collins families that she helped to found.

I have found the stories of only two of her children - my great grandmother Mary Violetta and her sister Eliza Jane. Were there other living children with stories that are yet to be discovered?  As they say, watch this space!

© Deborah Watson 2016





Monday, 23 May 2016

Symonds Street Story



This is a blog I wrote when I was working in the Auckland Central Research Centre. The story is too good to lose and, although I am in no way related to the subject of my research, I grew quite fond of him as I learned his story.

A memorial in St Andrews Cemetery, Newcastle- Upon- Tyne says:

“In loving remembrance of George Brewis McQueen, solicitor of this town who went to Auckland New Zealand for the benefit of his health and died one month after his arrival November 16th 1874 aged 26 years and was interred in Auckland Cemetery. His gentle loving disposition endeared him to all who knew him. His end was peace. Also Robert McQueen brother of the above who died July the 11th 1859 aged 1 year and 10 months. Robert McQueen father of the above died December 14th 1890 aged 71 years. Also Frances his wife died October 9th 1893 aged 78 years.”

George’s grave is situated in the Symonds Street Cemetery where his gravestone is still in fairly good condition.  A search of the Symonds Street cemetery records on Auckland Libraries Digital Library shows the partial transcription of the stone.  But what is George’s story?  Why is he buried alone in Auckland when his immediate family are buried in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne?

A search of Ancestry.com reveals that George Brewis McQueen was born in January 1849 in Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Northumberland, England.  His parents were Robert McQueen (1819-1890) and Frances (Fanny) Brewis (1816-1893) who married in December 1847.

George had one sister, Elizabeth Brewis McQueen who was born in 1851 and two brothers, William Brewis McQueen who was born in 1854 and Robert who was born in 1857 and died in July 1859.

In 1851 the family were living at 7 Wellington Street, Newcastle on Tyne.  George’s maternal grandmother was living with the family too – they were awaiting the birth of George’s sister so she was possibly with them to help with the new baby.  The family also had a 17 year old servant girl living with them.  Robert McQueen was a Cutler (a maker of cutlery) & maker of surgical instruments.

In 1861 the family are at 3 St Cuthberts Terrace, Gateshead, Durham.  George and his sister Elizabeth have been joined by their brother William.  Robert McQueen is still a Cutler by trade but he is now an employer of 1 man and 2 boys.  The family are cared for by a 16 year old servant girl.

In 1871 the family continue at 3 St Cuthberts Terrace.  Robert describes himself as a Cutler & Surgical Instrument Maker, George at the age of 22 years is an Attorney & Solicitor and William is an apprentice Cutler.  Robert will later change the name of his business to McQueen & Son when Robert partners with him in the business.


On 11 April 1873 The London Gazette reports that George is to be Ensign in the 8th Durham Rifle Volunteer Corps on 12 April 1873.

In January 1874, George is in partnership with William Chartres and John Youll, who are attorneys and solicitors at 18 Grainger Street West, Newcastle Upon Tyne. Then, less than six months later, the London Gazette of 21 July 1874 reports that the partnership of Chartres, Youll and McQueen has been dissolved by mutual consent on 6 July 1874.  Three days after that notice was signed, on 09 July 1874, George is in London boarding a ship for New Zealand. 

Auckland Area Passenger Arrivals 1838-1889 says that George arrived in Auckland on the “Zealandia” on 15 October 1874.  A quick check of Auckland Area Passenger Vessels 1838-1886 and I find the “Zealandia” leaving London on 09 July 1874 with 219 immigrants aboard.  George is a Saloon passenger rather than an immigrant, so it may be that he was not planning to settle in New Zealand indefinitely. 
George is now safely in New Zealand after a three month sea voyage and he books in to Riding’s Boarding House in Turner Street (off Upper Queen Street).  Mrs G L Riding provided apartments for families, and room with or without board for gentlemen at Wolverton House.

Papers Past reveals that just one month later, George is dead.  Friends are invited to his funeral, leaving from Riding’s Boarding House.

Someone arranged his funeral; someone arranged for a burial plot and a gravestone.  I will probably never know who did this for him; or even why George decided to come out to New Zealand; or whether he came alone or with companions.  He may have indeed been ill as his memorial suggests (a colleague suggested tuberculosis) or there could have been other reasons to come half way around the world.

On 28 January 1875 Robert McQueen proved the will of his son George Brewis McQueen.  George left effects of less than £200. 


His tidy grave site is regularly tended by a kind hearted stranger who never knew George or his story.

© Deborah Watson 2016

Sunday, 22 May 2016

Hidden Clues in Discarded Documents


Family History involves a great deal of detective work which is both enjoyable and frustrating.  One tends to examine documents for the tiniest details and then put them to one side or, if you are really serious about your family research, you file them away in the relevant family file.  Every so often they are pulled out to examine again and a real gem that hasn’t been noted previously may emerge.

In my search for my great grandfather Richard George Collins’ immigration to New Zealand circa 1880, several digital databases have provided the evidence I need to back up my hunches.

Long ago I downloaded a document from findmypast which I thought could possibly be the immigration of “my” Richard:


Although the age was correct there were a couple of problems. 

1. Richard was never known as “Richard Collins” - from babyhood he had used his second name, George, as his given name.  

2. The ship sailed a week after George’s wedding day and no wife was listed on the passenger list although it was clear from other records that she was in New Zealand at the end of that year.  

So I filed away the passenger list because there was no conclusive proof that Richard Collins (with no second name recorded) travelling 3rd class from Plymouth England to Sydney Australia on the Chimborazo in January 1880 was my Richard George Collins.  Sigh.
 
Sometime later I thought it might be a good plan to see if there was anything about my man in Papers Past.  This database www.paperspast.natlib.govt.nz has digitised New Zealand newspapers covering the years 1839-1945.  My search turned up an article in the Auckland Star on 5 October 1897 with an interesting title – “Railway Disaster, the inquest”.  To my surprise Richard George Collins was a witness to a fatal accident between a train and a horse drawn bus. But it was the evidence of another witness which made my mind race:



Where had I seen the name “Maples” before?  Ah yes, that document that I had tucked away a few years back; the Chimborazo passenger list of 1880.  Who was that person just above Richard Collins on the list?  It was Alfred Maples, the father of the bystander in the report above and also the uncle of Richard George Collins.  All of a sudden a document which had been a “maybe” suddenly became a “definite”.

Alfred William Maples senior, George’s companion on the Chimborazo was escaping England and deserting his wife in order to start a new life and a new family in Australia.  Young George was travelling with his uncle.  You could have knocked me down with a feather!

I was surprised to discover that the steamer Chimborazo’s voyage had been shorter than I thought it would be.  The British Newspaper Archive contains newspapers from 1603 to the present day and has reports of the voyage. The Chimborazo had a dreadful trip starting out on 08 February 1880 and striking a storm on 10 February.  Many newspapers in England, Australia and even New Zealand reported the tragedy that occurred – this account is from the Staffordshire Sentinel on 11 February:



After undergoing a refit she set off on her journey again on 16 February. One can only imagine how much courage it took for the passengers to re-board.  The following is a clip from the wonderfully named “Newcastle Morning Herald and Miners’ Advocate”: 


Regardless of its false start, the steamer arrived in Sydney on 04 April having dropped passengers in Melbourne on the way – a total of just 47 days.  Not bad for 1880!

© Deborah Watson 2016